Re: Review items for EXCEPT TABLE publication

On Thu, Sep 10, 2026 at 9:47 PM vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 10 Sept 2026 at 17:11, Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)
> <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > Dear Vignesh,
> >
> > > Thanks kuroda-san. I have addressed this in the v2 version patch
> > > attached, however I did not change the lock mode and used the existing
> > > AccessShareLock mode itself as I felt that should suffice. This
> > > approach also addresses Chao's comments from [1].
> >
> > My intention was similar but can we unify codes for re-validation?
> > My idea attached here could be applied atop v2.
>
> Thanks, this looks better. The attached v3 version incorporates these changes.
> I have also addressed Amit's suggestion from [1] and the test comment
> fixes from [2]. Additionally, the test changes have been consolidated
> into a single v3-002 patch.
>
> [1] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAA4eK1J-W2omce_%2BD%2BNn9syUA3DPOkKHyB1K24pXGCEpfksYkg%40mail.gmail.com
> [2] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/OS9PR01MB12149C3E3EC7D9738644CEBD8F5BF2%40OS9PR01MB12149.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
>

v3.* LGTM.

thanks
Shveta