| From: | Ayush Tiwari <ayushtiwari(dot)slg01(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, hackerzheng666(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #19629: pg_restore_relation_stats reports XX000 instead of proper SQLSTATE for input validation errors |
| Date: | 2026-08-21 05:18:30 |
| Message-ID: | CAJTYsWWmPrvTaVTuKtjXA84f3+PDVPitf5X91_QkuhOe-5Qaeg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Hi,
On Fri, 21 Aug 2026 at 04:00, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2026 at 09:42:18PM +0530, Ayush Tiwari wrote:
> > On Wed, 19 Aug 2026 at 20:52, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >> I think this should be backpatched to v18, where
> >> pg_restore_relation_stats() and pg_restore_attribute_stats() were
> >> introduced.
> >>
> >> Thought?
>
> Adding an errcode() is a life improvement thing. So, while I agree
> that the proposed patch is an improvement, I don't see a strong need
> for a backpatch. Feel free to override this argument as you feel, of
> course.
>
FWIW I think it's more of a bug too rather than just improvement
some of the applications depend on the errcode PG emits
to give end results.
> Just a note: I've tried to be careful with assigning errcodes for all
> the new error paths of extended_stats_funcs.c added in v19 that can be
> reached by SQL. If there are holes in there, please let me know.
>
> > Found some more places where the issue exists and added
> > there. Maybe you can incorporate those too in your patch?
>
> I'd suggest to keep things isolated in their own fashion, as they
> address different areas with slightly different user-changes changes
> (okay, not much).
>
Ahh atleast for 19629-31 I thought they shared the exact root cause
of not specified errcodes, and there were few more in the tree, but
I'm fine with the splitting part if needed.
Regards,
Ayush
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2026-08-21 07:55:43 | Re: BUG #19598: pg_waldump: -s/-e accept out-of-range WAL locations and silently use the low 32 bits |
| Previous Message | Andrey Rachitskiy | 2026-08-21 05:01:59 | Re: BUG #19633: Unexpected results of IN (subquery) with a non-deterministic collation |