| From: | Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Add test module for Table Access Method |
| Date: | 2024-01-15 13:26:08 |
| Message-ID: | CAJ7c6TM3=tnDYAWyyvRB6UdeoafXaPPMq+XpafW+ZBcOnkg1gA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
> When trying to implement a table access method in the past I remember
> very well that I was having a really hard time finding an example of
> one.
To be fair, Postgres uses TAM internally, so there is at least one
complete and up-to-date real-life example. Learning curve for TAMs is
indeed steep, and I wonder if we could do a better job in this respect
e.g. by providing a simpler example. This being said, I know several
people who learned TAM successfully (so far only for R&D tasks) which
indicates that its difficulty is adequate.
--
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2024-01-15 14:03:36 | Re: Oom on temp (un-analyzed table caused by JIT) V16.1 |
| Previous Message | David Geier | 2024-01-15 13:24:38 | Re: postgres_fdw fails to see that array type belongs to extension |