Re: Add test module for Table Access Method

From: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Add test module for Table Access Method
Date: 2024-01-15 09:36:49
Message-ID: CAGECzQR0OExsrx33nBkySPkDShSn-izcz+JhVrqTrJwRfAQm6w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 28 Sept 2023 at 03:08, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> dummy_index_am has included from the start additional coverage for the
> various internal add_*_reloption routines, that were never covered in
> the core tree. Except if I am missing something, I am not seeing some
> of the extra usefulness for the patch you've sent here.

When trying to implement a table access method in the past I remember
very well that I was having a really hard time finding an example of
one. I remember seeing the dummy_index_am module and being quite
disappointed that there wasn't a similar one for table access methods.
I believe that I eventually found blackhole_am, but it took me quite a
bit of mailing list spelunking to get there. So I think purely for
documentation purposes this addition would already be useful.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrei Lepikhov 2024-01-15 09:46:03 Re: POC: GROUP BY optimization
Previous Message Daniel Gustafsson 2024-01-15 09:29:25 Re: On login trigger: take three