Re: Review items for EXCEPT TABLE publication

From: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Review items for EXCEPT TABLE publication
Date: 2026-09-11 07:04:10
Message-ID: CAHut+Pt2So0ifpwo6_cheqisLDLLsYCp2CnQ63FbpMoDRVUC9A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Sep 11, 2026 at 4:34 PM vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 11 Sept 2026 at 11:21, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 10, 2026 at 11:09 AM vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Finding #5: SET UNLOGGED on an excluded table produces an unrestorable
> > > catalog state
> > >
> >
> > + if (!toLogged &&
> > + GetRelationExcludedPublications(RelationGetRelid(rel)) != NIL)
> > + ereport(ERROR,
> > + (errcode(ERRCODE_OBJECT_NOT_IN_PREREQUISITE_STATE),
> > + errmsg("cannot change table \"%s\" to unlogged because i
> >
> > Can we have one unified function to check whether a table is part of
> > any publication and get an additional out parameter whether that is an
> > include or exclude table? As we can't have the same table both
> > included and excluded, this should work unless I am missing something.
>
> Here is an updated v4 version patch to handle the same.
>

In my earlier example, there are both precept t and f.

Won't your v4 new function return a random *isexcept result based on
the first one it stumbles upon?

IIUC, that `isexcept` out parameter should maybe be called
`has_any_except`, and you should iterate until you find the first
prexcept==true or find none.

======
[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAHut%2BPunLReA86mPmi7Wr1-Hd_TnhtM1%2BKo8Bc6HhBz1LRjQNg%40mail.gmail.com

Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Yilin Zhang 2026-09-11 07:09:59 Re: bug: query returns different result with and without memoization.
Previous Message Sebas Mannem 2026-09-11 06:47:27 Re: NOT NULL NOT ENFORCED