Re: Review items for EXCEPT TABLE publication

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Review items for EXCEPT TABLE publication
Date: 2026-09-11 07:22:36
Message-ID: CAA4eK1K0y9agCLxKkB19DwhSoZbnVU=xejNQjuHjKfS+ou3zxQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Sep 11, 2026 at 12:34 PM Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> In my earlier example, there are both precept t and f.
>
> Won't your v4 new function return a random *isexcept result based on
> the first one it stumbles upon?
>

Yes, but how does that matter? We just don't want the operation to
proceed when the table is part of publication, users anyway need to
fix it before proceeding.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2026-09-11 07:33:37 Re: Support for 8-byte TOAST values, round two
Previous Message Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu) 2026-09-11 07:22:16 RE: Crashes on a partition whose concurrent detach never finished