Re: Fix data checksum processing for temp relations and dropped databases

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Fix data checksum processing for temp relations and dropped databases
Date: 2026-07-10 00:12:29
Message-ID: CAHGQGwGaXoAPO814Hn87edzegW53wVTR0RoPPBdHCR43f03FGw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jul 9, 2026 at 4:56 PM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> wrote:
> I like this suggestion, though I think it should go after the call to
> pgstat_progress_update_param since the db in question reached ProcessDatabase.
> I would add it as an else-if case to the conditional testing we have for
> _FAILED and _ABORTED.

Thanks for the review! I've updated the patch based on
your and Horiguchi-san's suggestions.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao

Attachment Content-Type Size
v2-0001-Fix-data-checksum-processing-for-temp-relations-a.patch application/octet-stream 3.8 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2026-07-10 00:14:12 Re: s/pg_attribute_always_inline/pg_always_inline/?
Previous Message Alberto Piai 2026-07-10 00:10:57 Re: Adding a stored generated column without long-lived locks