| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me> |
| Cc: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: s/pg_attribute_always_inline/pg_always_inline/? |
| Date: | 2026-07-10 00:14:12 |
| Message-ID: | 2811067.1783642452@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me> writes:
> Does "backpatching the new macro" mean we'd also adjust all existing
> places to use the new macro or not? I mean, we could backpatch just the
> bit in c.h. I plan to adjust the places, to minimize possible conflicts
> when backpatching other stuff.
I think it'd be sufficient to add the new macro to the old branches.
The point of back-patching at all, I think, is to save ourselves
work if we have to back-patch some new code that uses the new style.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ewan Young | 2026-07-10 02:44:12 | Re: Fix duplicate detection for null-treatment window functions |
| Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2026-07-10 00:12:29 | Re: Fix data checksum processing for temp relations and dropped databases |