Re: max_sync_workers_per_subscription is missing in postgresql.conf

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: max_sync_workers_per_subscription is missing in postgresql.conf
Date: 2017-04-10 16:39:06
Message-ID: CAHGQGwEokE9nJRVgnoWSUvxbUGgT61O2oYJ-C+TaxQoLPTdzFg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 9:39 PM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 9:32 PM, Petr Jelinek
> <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> On 10/04/17 07:16, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Attached a patch for $subject.
>>>
>>> I added this parameter into "Asynchronous Behavior" section of
>>> "RESOURCE" section. But GUC parameter for subscriber now is written in
>>> this section, in spite of there is "REPLICATION" section. I think that
>>> we can coordinate these parameters to not confuse user. For example in
>>> documentation, these parameters are described in "19.6.4. Subscribers"
>>> section of "19.6. Replication" section. Thought?

Yes, I think that we should not only add the parameter into
postgresql.conf.sample
but also

- add REPLICATION_SUBSCRIBERS into config_group
- mark max_logical_replication_workers and max_sync_workers_per_subscription
as REPLICATION_SUBSCRIBERS parameters, in guc.c
- move those parameters into "Subscribers" section in postgresql.conf.sample

The attached patch does these.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao

Attachment Content-Type Size
Add_max_sync_workers_per_subscription_into_postgresql_conf_v3.patch application/octet-stream 2.5 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2017-04-10 16:45:19 Re: src/interfaces/libpq shipping nmake-related Makefiles
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-04-10 16:25:59 Re: GCC 7 warnings