Re: Add "io worker" as backend_type to the pg_stat_activity documentation

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Add "io worker" as backend_type to the pg_stat_activity documentation
Date: 2026-07-21 16:48:25
Message-ID: CAHGQGwEDY0GkP4Tapn+qtaxB6aNtjPzqozRL8_Hf1Sg3B+H+8w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On Tue, Jul 21, 2026 at 6:59 PM Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2026-07-21 at 17:02 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 21, 2026 at 09:58:34AM +0200, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> > > I happened to notice that "io worker" was missing in the list of
> > > backend types in the pg_stat_activity documentation.
> >
> > Right.

Isn't it better to add the other missing process names as well, such as
slotsync worker, data checksums launcher, data checksums worker, and
REPACK decoding worker?

Also, the current list says "logical replication worker", but that isn't
an actual process name. It refers to four different worker types:
logical replication apply worker, logical replication parallel worker,
logical replication sequence synchronization worker, and logical replication
table synchronization worker. Isn't it better to list those actual
process names instead?

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Brian Brennglass 2026-07-21 17:30:13 Re: [PATCH] doc: outline all planner nodes
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2026-07-21 16:06:31 Re: Please clarify that Timestamp with Timezone doesn't preserve the timezone.