| From: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Add "io worker" as backend_type to the pg_stat_activity documentation |
| Date: | 2026-07-21 09:59:07 |
| Message-ID: | eb735d8aedf16ab2121af6f9b65b3274927afd2d.camel@cybertec.at |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Tue, 2026-07-21 at 17:02 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2026 at 09:58:34AM +0200, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> > I happened to notice that "io worker" was missing in the list of
> > backend types in the pg_stat_activity documentation.
>
> Right.
>
> > I wondered vaguely if the list should be sorted alphabetically,
> > but didn't do it a) to keep the patch easy to read and
> > b) because the list is not long enough for readers to get lost.
>
> And here I just thought while looking at this section of the docs that
> the list is super long, and that we could reshape it the same way as
> "state" for the possible values, sorting it on the way.
Ok, here is a patch with the list sorted alphabetically and
converted into an itemiized list.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v2-0001-Document-io-worker-as-possible-backend_type.patch | text/x-patch | 5.9 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2026-07-21 16:00:01 | Re: Suspected documentation error |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2026-07-21 08:02:40 | Re: Add "io worker" as backend_type to the pg_stat_activity documentation |