Re: Add "io worker" as backend_type to the pg_stat_activity documentation

From: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Add "io worker" as backend_type to the pg_stat_activity documentation
Date: 2026-07-21 09:59:07
Message-ID: eb735d8aedf16ab2121af6f9b65b3274927afd2d.camel@cybertec.at
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On Tue, 2026-07-21 at 17:02 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2026 at 09:58:34AM +0200, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> > I happened to notice that "io worker" was missing in the list of
> > backend types in the pg_stat_activity documentation.
>
> Right.
>
> > I wondered vaguely if the list should be sorted alphabetically,
> > but didn't do it a) to keep the patch easy to read and
> > b) because the list is not long enough for readers to get lost.
>
> And here I just thought while looking at this section of the docs that
> the list is super long, and that we could reshape it the same way as
> "state" for the possible values, sorting it on the way.

Ok, here is a patch with the list sorted alphabetically and
converted into an itemiized list.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe

Attachment Content-Type Size
v2-0001-Document-io-worker-as-possible-backend_type.patch text/x-patch 5.9 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2026-07-21 16:00:01 Re: Suspected documentation error
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2026-07-21 08:02:40 Re: Add "io worker" as backend_type to the pg_stat_activity documentation