Re: Add "io worker" as backend_type to the pg_stat_activity documentation

From: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Add "io worker" as backend_type to the pg_stat_activity documentation
Date: 2026-07-21 19:04:15
Message-ID: 4aff5b0f5a1bf3b487d06daec5ed5a287afa7a22.camel@cybertec.at
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On Wed, 2026-07-22 at 01:48 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 21, 2026 at 09:58:34AM +0200, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> > > > I happened to notice that "io worker" was missing in the list of
> > > > backend types in the pg_stat_activity documentation.
>
> Isn't it better to add the other missing process names as well, such as
> slotsync worker, data checksums launcher, data checksums worker, and
> REPACK decoding worker?
>
> Also, the current list says "logical replication worker", but that isn't
> an actual process name. It refers to four different worker types:
> logical replication apply worker, logical replication parallel worker,
> logical replication sequence synchronization worker, and logical replication
> table synchronization worker. Isn't it better to list those actual
> process names instead?

You are right. Here is patch v3 with a completed list; I hope I didn't
forget anything.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe

Attachment Content-Type Size
v3-0001-Properly-document-pg_stat_activity.backend_type.patch text/x-patch 7.8 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2026-07-21 22:18:33 Re: Add "io worker" as backend_type to the pg_stat_activity documentation
Previous Message Brian Brennglass 2026-07-21 17:30:13 Re: [PATCH] doc: outline all planner nodes