From: | Euler Taveira <euler(dot)taveira(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Cc: | Masahiko Sawada <masahiko(dot)sawada(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Problem with logical replication |
Date: | 2020-05-15 11:48:53 |
Message-ID: | CAH503wCfFxUS_VZhFEAfXvKJNgkYVOexfsDFiYDyLQTU3dOC4g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 15 May 2020 at 02:47, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> Agreed. I don't think either that we need to update this comment. I
> was playing with this patch and what you have here looks fine by me.
> Two nits: the extra parenthesis in the assert are not necessary, and
> the indentation had some diffs. Tom has just reindented the whole
> tree, so let's keep things clean.
>
>
LGTM.
--
Euler Taveira http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dilip Kumar | 2020-05-15 11:50:55 | Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2020-05-15 11:18:58 | Re: pg13: xlogreader API adjust |