Re: Problem with logical replication

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Euler Taveira <euler(dot)taveira(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <masahiko(dot)sawada(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Problem with logical replication
Date: 2020-05-16 09:20:46
Message-ID: 20200516092046.GG212736@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 08:48:53AM -0300, Euler Taveira wrote:
> On Fri, 15 May 2020 at 02:47, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>> Agreed. I don't think either that we need to update this comment. I
>> was playing with this patch and what you have here looks fine by me.
>> Two nits: the extra parenthesis in the assert are not necessary, and
>> the indentation had some diffs. Tom has just reindented the whole
>> tree, so let's keep things clean.
>
> LGTM.

Thanks for double-checking. Applied and back-patched down to 10
then.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ranier Vilela 2020-05-16 11:39:18 Re: calling procedures is slow and consumes extra much memory against calling function
Previous Message legrand legrand 2020-05-16 09:01:35 Re: Is it useful to record whether plans are generic or custom?