Re: strange perf regression with data checksums

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me>
Cc: Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: strange perf regression with data checksums
Date: 2025-06-06 16:33:44
Message-ID: CAH2-WznZBhWqDBDVGh1VhVBLgLqaYHEkPhmVV7mJCr1Y3ZQhQQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jun 4, 2025 at 1:39 PM Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> wrote:
> My current plan is to commit this in the next couple of days.

Pushed.

It would be great if we could also teach BufferGetLSNAtomic() to just
call PageGetLSN() (at least on PG_HAVE_8BYTE_SINGLE_COPY_ATOMICITY
platforms), but my sense is that that's not going to happen in
Postgres 18.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2025-06-06 16:37:40 Re: Unnecessary connection overhead due copy-on-write (mainly openssl)
Previous Message Nathan Bossart 2025-06-06 16:33:36 Re: CHECKPOINT unlogged data