Re: strange perf regression with data checksums

Hello Peter,

06.06.2025 19:33, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 4, 2025 at 1:39 PM Peter Geoghegan<pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> wrote:
>> My current plan is to commit this in the next couple of days.
> Pushed.

Please look at the following script, which falsifies an assertion
introduced with e6eed40e4:
create user u;
grant all on schema public to u;
set session authorization u;
create table tbl1 (a int);
create function f1() returns int language plpgsql as $$ invalid $$;

select sum(1) over (partition by 1 order by objid)
  from pg_shdepend
  left join pg_stat_sys_indexes on refclassid = relid
  left join tbl1 on true
limit 1;
(I've simplified an assert-triggering query generated by SQLsmith.)

TRAP: failed Assert("!BTScanPosIsPinned(so->currPos)"), File: "nbtutils.c", Line: 3379, PID: 1621028
ExceptionalCondition at assert.c:52:13
_bt_killitems at nbtutils.c:3380:3
_bt_steppage at nbtsearch.c:2134:5
_bt_next at nbtsearch.c:1560:7
btgettuple at nbtree.c:276:6
index_getnext_tid at indexam.c:640:25
index_getnext_slot at indexam.c:729:10
IndexNext at nodeIndexscan.c:131:9
ExecScanFetch at execScan.h:126:10
...

Best regards,
Alexander