Re: Amcheck: do rightlink verification with lock coupling

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: "Andrey M(dot) Borodin" <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Amcheck: do rightlink verification with lock coupling
Date: 2020-08-03 22:44:34
Message-ID: CAH2-Wz=Jn-_muYc9fV0t_W8hqsui85b6u46_xOWFMhtgge6KJw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 11:46 AM Andrey M. Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru> wrote:
> In this thread [0] we decided that lock coupling is necessary for btree_xlog_unlink_page().
> So, maybe let's revive this patch?

Yes, let's do that. Can you resubmit it, please?

Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2020-08-03 22:55:36 Re: [PATCH] Btree BackwardScan race condition on Standby during VACUUM
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2020-08-03 22:44:03 Re: psql - improve test coverage from 41% to 88%