| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Add test module for Table Access Method |
| Date: | 2023-09-28 01:08:24 |
| Message-ID: | ZRTR7uKogg3YLTFZ@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Jun 03, 2023 at 07:42:36PM -0400, Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
> So in order to improve things a bit in this area I'm proposing to add a
> test module for Table Access Method similar what we already have for Index
> Access Method.
>
> This code is based on the "blackhole_am" implemented by Michael Paquier:
> https://github.com/michaelpq/pg_plugins/tree/main/blackhole_am
dummy_index_am has included from the start additional coverage for the
various internal add_*_reloption routines, that were never covered in
the core tree. Except if I am missing something, I am not seeing some
of the extra usefulness for the patch you've sent here.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Rowley | 2023-09-28 01:11:06 | Re: Set enable_seqscan doesn't take effect? |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2023-09-28 01:07:48 | Re: Eager page freeze criteria clarification |