Re: Assignment of valid collation for SET operations on queries with UNKNOWN types.

From: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Assignment of valid collation for SET operations on queries with UNKNOWN types.
Date: 2017-01-25 11:12:05
Message-ID: CAFjFpRfqi47vCdo7EUw6Fw8uTh2O5EwM37QEMnzSZ+ErTprw_g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 10:54 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 12:46 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> I wrote:
>>> Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>>>> The table of Pseudo-Types needs to be updated as well with unknown in
>>>> datatype.sgml.
>>
>>> Check.
>>
>> Here's an updated patch with doc changes. Aside from that one,
>> I tried to spell "pseudo-type" consistently, and I changed one
>> place where we were calling something a pseudo-type that isn't.

I think, those changes, even though small, deserve their own commit.
The changes themselves look good.

--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Emre Hasegeli 2017-01-25 11:24:18 Re: Floating point comparison inconsistencies of the geometric types
Previous Message Shailesh Singh 2017-01-25 11:03:14 Fwd: I could not see any row in audit table