Re: Assignment of valid collation for SET operations on queries with UNKNOWN types.

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Assignment of valid collation for SET operations on queries with UNKNOWN types.
Date: 2017-01-25 14:37:11
Message-ID: 7176.1485355031@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 10:54 AM, Michael Paquier
> <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 12:46 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> Here's an updated patch with doc changes. Aside from that one,
>>> I tried to spell "pseudo-type" consistently, and I changed one
>>> place where we were calling something a pseudo-type that isn't.

> I think, those changes, even though small, deserve their own commit.
> The changes themselves look good.

Pushed, thanks for the reviews!

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-01-25 14:53:29 Re: sequence data type
Previous Message Adrian Klaver 2017-01-25 14:26:35 Re: Fwd: I could not see any row in audit table