Re: [PROPOSAL] Shared Ispell dictionaries

2018-03-07 14:10 GMT+01:00 Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>:

>
>
> 2018-03-07 13:58 GMT+01:00 Arthur Zakirov <a(dot)zakirov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>:
>
>> On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 01:47:25PM +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>> > > Do you mean that a shared dictionary should be reloaded if its .affix
>> > > and .dict files was changed? IMHO we can store last modification
>> > > timestamp of them in a preprocessed file, and then we can rebuild the
>> > > dictionary if files was changed.
>> > >
>> >
>> > No, it is not necessary - just there should be commands (functions) for
>> > preload dictiory and unload dictionary.
>>
>> Oh understood. Tomas suggested those commands too earlier. I'll
>> implement them. But I think it is better to track files modification time
>> too. Because now, without the patch, users don't have to call additional
>> commands to refresh their dictionaries, so without such tracking we'll
>> made dictionaries maintenance harder.
>>
>
> Postgres hasn't any subsystem based on modification time, so introduction
> this sensitivity, I don't see, practical.
>

Usually the shared dictionaries are used for complex language based
fulltext. The frequence of updates of these dictionaries is less than
updates PostgreSQL. The czech dictionary is same 10 years.

Regards

Pavel

>
> Regards
>
> Pavel
>
>
>
>>
>> --
>> Arthur Zakirov
>> Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
>> Russian Postgres Company
>>
>
>