Re: [PROPOSAL] Shared Ispell dictionaries

From: Arthur Zakirov <a(dot)zakirov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Ildus Kurbangaliev <i(dot)kurbangaliev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Shared Ispell dictionaries
Date: 2018-03-07 13:18:20
Message-ID: 20180307131819.GA13301@zakirov.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 02:12:32PM +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> 2018-03-07 14:10 GMT+01:00 Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> > 2018-03-07 13:58 GMT+01:00 Arthur Zakirov <a(dot)zakirov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>:
> >> Oh understood. Tomas suggested those commands too earlier. I'll
> >> implement them. But I think it is better to track files modification time
> >> too. Because now, without the patch, users don't have to call additional
> >> commands to refresh their dictionaries, so without such tracking we'll
> >> made dictionaries maintenance harder.
> >>
> >
> > Postgres hasn't any subsystem based on modification time, so introduction
> > this sensitivity, I don't see, practical.
> >
> Usually the shared dictionaries are used for complex language based
> fulltext. The frequence of updates of these dictionaries is less than
> updates PostgreSQL. The czech dictionary is same 10 years.

Agree. In this case auto reloading isn't important feature here.

Arthur Zakirov
Postgres Professional:
Russian Postgres Company

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ildar Musin 2018-03-07 13:21:50 Re: General purpose hashing func in pgbench
Previous Message Prabhat Sahu 2018-03-07 13:13:37 Re: [HACKERS] Parallel tuplesort (for parallel B-Tree index creation)