| From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Mithun Cy <mithun(dot)cy(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Hash Indexes |
| Date: | 2016-10-02 15:42:37 |
| Message-ID: | CAFj8pRD5uC4ZWctuAL+3qT=OCjLApaH1e9pNjOw-Cs8UNyjwzg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2016-10-02 12:40 GMT+02:00 Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> On Sun, Oct 2, 2016 at 3:31 AM, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu> wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 2:11 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> >> For one thing, we can stop shipping a totally broken feature in release
> after release
> >
> > For what it's worth I'm for any patch that can accomplish that.
> >
> > In retrospect I think we should have done the hash-over-btree thing
> > ten years ago but we didn't and if Amit's patch makes hash indexes
> > recoverable today then go for it.
>
> +1.
>
+1
Pavel
> --
> Michael
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2016-10-02 16:54:05 | Re: pg_upgade vs config |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2016-10-02 14:06:37 | Re: pg_upgade vs config |