Re: Hash Indexes

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Mithun Cy <mithun(dot)cy(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Hash Indexes
Date: 2016-10-03 01:54:52
Message-ID: CAB7nPqTNDEeanDLvmE5kG_kuTNSKNm=xeezKiLUxzGyYjKzMVQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 12:42 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
> 2016-10-02 12:40 GMT+02:00 Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 2, 2016 at 3:31 AM, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu> wrote:
>> > On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 2:11 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
>> > wrote:
>> >> For one thing, we can stop shipping a totally broken feature in release
>> >> after release
>> >
>> > For what it's worth I'm for any patch that can accomplish that.
>> >
>> > In retrospect I think we should have done the hash-over-btree thing
>> > ten years ago but we didn't and if Amit's patch makes hash indexes
>> > recoverable today then go for it.
>>
>> +1.
>
> +1

And moved to next CF to make it breath.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2016-10-03 01:57:37 Re: Patch: Write Amplification Reduction Method (WARM)
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2016-10-03 01:53:54 Re: PoC: Partial sort