| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Mithun Cy <mithun(dot)cy(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Hash Indexes |
| Date: | 2016-10-02 10:40:01 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqTRG02-HG2yZDyQbUNWb42Cf-3f9vGigqdDHHuuQjOSSg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Oct 2, 2016 at 3:31 AM, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 2:11 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> For one thing, we can stop shipping a totally broken feature in release after release
>
> For what it's worth I'm for any patch that can accomplish that.
>
> In retrospect I think we should have done the hash-over-btree thing
> ten years ago but we didn't and if Amit's patch makes hash indexes
> recoverable today then go for it.
+1.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2016-10-02 12:42:38 | Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade from 9.5 to 9.6 fails with "invalid argument" |
| Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2016-10-02 08:36:22 | Re: On conflict update & hint bits |