Re: [patch] Proposal for \crosstabview in psql

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>, Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [patch] Proposal for \crosstabview in psql
Date: 2016-03-19 15:14:51
Message-ID: CAFj8pRCtt=uDq6vwmDeR-+Dsp3CaX0Wz2Ltnb3b0iduhWRPpBw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2016-03-19 15:45 GMT+01:00 Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>:

> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 2:55 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 10:34 AM, Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>
> wrote:
> >>> But worse than either of those things, there is no real
> >>> agreement on what the overall design of this feature
> >>> should be.
> >>
> >> The part in the design that raised concerns upthread is
> >> essentially how headers sorting is exposed to the user and
> >> implemented.
> >>
> >> As suggested in [1], I've made some drastic changes in the
> >> attached patch to take the comments (from Dean R., Tom L.)
> >> into account.
> >> [ ... lengthy explanation ... ]
> >> - also NULLs are no longer excluded from headers, per Peter E.
> >> comment in [2].
> >
> > Dean, Tom, Peter, what do you think of the new version?
>
> Is anyone up for re-reviewing this? If not, I think we're going to
> have to reject this for lack of interest.
>

Can I do review?

Pavel

>
> --
> Robert Haas
> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2016-03-19 15:26:31 Re: incorrect docs for pgbench / skipped transactions
Previous Message Robert Haas 2016-03-19 14:47:18 Re: psql metaqueries with \gexec