Re: incorrect docs for pgbench / skipped transactions

From: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
Cc: PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: incorrect docs for pgbench / skipped transactions
Date: 2016-03-19 15:26:31
Message-ID: c235bb4b-21be-1442-196f-be0bf6957968@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 03/19/2016 08:29 AM, Fabien COELHO wrote:
>
...
>
> Here is an updated version of your proposal:
> - use <literal> instead of "
> - use script_no and mention -b as well
> - spell out skipped explanation after the sample output

Seems fine to me.

>
> Also, while reading the doc, I really think that the timestamp should
> be made explicit milliseconds, i.e. "123.004567" instead of "123
> 4567", but that is another question not relevant to this patch.

Agreed.

--
Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2016-03-19 15:31:09 Re: [patch] Proposal for \crosstabview in psql
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2016-03-19 15:14:51 Re: [patch] Proposal for \crosstabview in psql