| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [patch] Proposal for \crosstabview in psql |
| Date: | 2016-03-19 14:45:20 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoaHRe-ePFcRavt=WKK08gDDbaB2dCd03MxQCWhz5mGZFg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 2:55 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 10:34 AM, Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org> wrote:
>>> But worse than either of those things, there is no real
>>> agreement on what the overall design of this feature
>>> should be.
>>
>> The part in the design that raised concerns upthread is
>> essentially how headers sorting is exposed to the user and
>> implemented.
>>
>> As suggested in [1], I've made some drastic changes in the
>> attached patch to take the comments (from Dean R., Tom L.)
>> into account.
>> [ ... lengthy explanation ... ]
>> - also NULLs are no longer excluded from headers, per Peter E.
>> comment in [2].
>
> Dean, Tom, Peter, what do you think of the new version?
Is anyone up for re-reviewing this? If not, I think we're going to
have to reject this for lack of interest.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2016-03-19 14:47:18 | Re: psql metaqueries with \gexec |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2016-03-19 14:42:51 | Re: [GENERAL] Request - repeat value of \pset title during \watch interations |