Re: Question about DROP TABLE

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michal Novotny <michal(dot)novotny(at)trustport(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Question about DROP TABLE
Date: 2016-01-12 11:01:30
Message-ID: CAFj8pRCWbVhOfeyf9Gfd2sGSbq4+3Q1DB=2wktpggyQumeFR9Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi

2016-01-12 11:57 GMT+01:00 Michal Novotny <michal(dot)novotny(at)trustport(dot)com>:

> Dear PostgreSQL Hackers,
> I've discovered an issue with dropping a large table (~5T). I was
> thinking drop table is fast operation however I found out my assumption
> was wrong.
>
> Is there any way how to tune it to drop a large table in the matter of
> seconds or minutes? Any configuration variable in the postgresql.conf or
> any tune up options available?
>

drop table should be fast.

There can be two reasons why not:

1. locks - are you sure, so this statement didn't wait on some lock?

2. filesystem issue - can you check the speed of rm 5TB file on your IO?

Regards

Pavel

>
> PostgreSQL version used is PgSQL 9.4.
>
> Thanks a lot!
> Michal
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2016-01-12 11:05:04 Re: Question about DROP TABLE
Previous Message Michal Novotny 2016-01-12 10:57:05 Question about DROP TABLE