Re: doc: update PL/pgSQL sample loop function

st 11. 9. 2019 v 7:45 odesílatel Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
napsal:

> On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 9:09 AM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> >
> > The current example shows the usage of looping in plpgsql, so as such
> > there is no correctness issue, but OTOH there is no harm in updating
> > the example as proposed by Ian Barwick. Does anyone else see any
> > problem with this idea? If we agree to proceed with this update, it
> > might be better to backpatch it for the sake of consistency though I
> > am not sure about that.
> >
>
> While checking the patch in back-branches, I noticed that it doesn't
> get applied to 9.4 due to the way the example forms the string. I
> have done the required changes for 9.4 as well and attached is the
> result.
>
>
Is question if for this queries should not be used some from
information_schema instead direct access to pg_catalog.

But I looked now, and we don't see materialized views in information_schema
- what is probably bug.

Pavel

> Ian, if possible, can you once check the patch for 9.4?
>
> --
> With Regards,
> Amit Kapila.
> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>