| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ian Barwick <ian(dot)barwick(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: doc: update PL/pgSQL sample loop function |
| Date: | 2019-09-11 05:44:59 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1JbuCteP7cnxZ1ZbOAmjwQfoygKPddkgboz7kFV9_Hxeg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 9:09 AM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> The current example shows the usage of looping in plpgsql, so as such
> there is no correctness issue, but OTOH there is no harm in updating
> the example as proposed by Ian Barwick. Does anyone else see any
> problem with this idea? If we agree to proceed with this update, it
> might be better to backpatch it for the sake of consistency though I
> am not sure about that.
>
While checking the patch in back-branches, I noticed that it doesn't
get applied to 9.4 due to the way the example forms the string. I
have done the required changes for 9.4 as well and attached is the
result.
Ian, if possible, can you once check the patch for 9.4?
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| 0001-Doc-Update-PL-pgSQL-sample-function-in-plpgsql.sgml.patch | application/octet-stream | 2.7 KB |
| 0001-94-Doc-Update-PL-pgSQL-sample-function-in-plpgsql.sgml.patch | application/octet-stream | 2.8 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2019-09-11 05:45:51 | Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] pageinspect function to decode infomasks |
| Previous Message | gc_11 | 2019-09-11 05:37:40 | 回复：Re: Does PostgreSQL support debian Linux on Arm CPU Platform? |