Re: Gather performance analysis

From: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Gather performance analysis
Date: 2021-10-26 09:03:14
Message-ID: CAFiTN-uaxNezqt6Qiij2TrhHP4yohvyzh-MaccBwdam3P=gTtg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 2:31 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 1:48 AM Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 10:14 AM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > > Thanks, yeah now it looks in line with other results.
> >
> > Since it seems there are no remaining concerns here, and we have
> > benchmarking results showing that the patch helps, I have committed
> > the patch.
> >
>
> Can we mark the corresponding CF entry [1] as committed?
>
> [1] - https://commitfest.postgresql.org/35/3304/

Done!

--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Yura Sokolov 2021-10-26 09:33:47 Re: XTS cipher mode for cluster file encryption
Previous Message Ronan Dunklau 2021-10-26 09:01:46 Re: pg_receivewal starting position