| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Gather performance analysis |
| Date: | 2021-10-26 09:01:25 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1KeV+1xykXLdQ+4-+e1MvaDGDACDs0V=702dXEt6B21Cg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 1:48 AM Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 10:14 AM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > Thanks, yeah now it looks in line with other results.
>
> Since it seems there are no remaining concerns here, and we have
> benchmarking results showing that the patch helps, I have committed
> the patch.
>
Can we mark the corresponding CF entry [1] as committed?
[1] - https://commitfest.postgresql.org/35/3304/
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ronan Dunklau | 2021-10-26 09:01:46 | Re: pg_receivewal starting position |
| Previous Message | Greg Nancarrow | 2021-10-26 08:57:32 | Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side |