Re: Remove "FROM" in "DELETE FROM" when using tab-completion

From: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Remove "FROM" in "DELETE FROM" when using tab-completion
Date: 2021-05-11 09:54:56
Message-ID: CAFiTN-syDqdV89Vmx4LRR4wp-WO-u1g640CZCoUcp8GfWAX0Jw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 3:03 PM tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com
<tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, May 11, 2021 5:44 PM, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >But your patch is doing nothing to add the implementation for DELETE..
> >USING. Basically, the tab completion support for DELETE....USING is
> >still pending right?
>
> I see, maybe I have a misunderstanding here, I thought tab completion for "DELETE....USING" means the code before it as follows.
> > > else if (TailMatches("DELETE", "FROM", MatchAny))
> > > COMPLETE_WITH("USING", "WHERE");
>
> So I just thought the tab completion support for DELETE....USING is not pending anymore.
> According to your feedback, maybe something beyond my knowledge is need to be done for DELETE....USING.

Basically, it just complete with USING, now after USING tab-completion
support is not yet there, e.g. DELETE FROM t1 USING t1 WHERE cond.
but the current code will not suggest anything after USING.

> Besides, you are right, the fix in the patch has nothing to do with the comment here.
> Patch updated to V2 with the sentence moved back. Thanks.

+1

--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Etsuro Fujita 2021-05-11 09:55:05 Re: Asynchronous Append on postgres_fdw nodes.
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2021-05-11 09:46:40 Re: pg_receivewal makes a bad daemon