Re: [PATCH] Remove useless ORDER BY from scalar subqueries

From: Iliia Khaprov <i(dot)khaprov(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: David Geier <geidav(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove useless ORDER BY from scalar subqueries
Date: 2026-10-28 09:05:58
Message-ID: CAFO+O_rnyq5mB-E0=WuB0QNJ1nACWFOHY=P=GzKwo6w9YHCb+g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi David,

Noted on backbranch patches, thanks. Does this include REL_19 too?
Would you mind looking at the master patch?

Best regards,
Iliia

On Wed, Oct 21, 2026 at 4:50 AM David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 21 Oct 2026 at 08:46, Iliia Khaprov <i(dot)khaprov(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > In the attached v2 (against b536d5a0bd7 and REL_13 to REL_19)
>
> I've not looked at any of this, but just so you're aware that since
> this isn't a bug fix, there's zero chance of any of this going into
> the backbranches. So you needn't bother with the hoard of backbranch
> patches.
>
> David

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jakub Wartak 2026-10-28 09:12:06 Re: [(known) BUG] DELETE/UPDATE more than one row in partitioned foreign table
Previous Message shveta malik 2026-10-28 08:57:53 Re: Proposal: Conflict log history table for Logical Replication