Re: [PATCH] Remove useless ORDER BY from scalar subqueries

From: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Iliia Khaprov <i(dot)khaprov(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: David Geier <geidav(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove useless ORDER BY from scalar subqueries
Date: 2026-10-28 09:55:01
Message-ID: CAApHDvpgzT=joQ9Mij5dA_dcdc1Frpws3Q6VN_HLPqGFtYOfOA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 28 Oct 2026 at 22:06, Iliia Khaprov <i(dot)khaprov(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Noted on backbranch patches, thanks. Does this include REL_19 too?

If the branch name ends in _STABLE, then it's a branch that won't
receive any new features.

> Would you mind looking at the master patch?

I think there's generally very little bandwidth at the moment for
looking at any new features. I won't be dedicating any of mine towards
this in the foreseeable future. Sorry. I just dropped in to reset your
expectations and to try and save you some wasted effort.

David

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ashutosh Sharma 2026-10-28 10:14:46 Re: Reduce logging during prepared transaction recovery
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2026-10-28 09:48:10 Re: Return pg_control from pg_backup_stop().