Re: Clarification on RLS policy

From: Dominique Devienne <ddevienne(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Vydehi Ganti <rayudugs(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Clarification on RLS policy
Date: 2025-04-25 13:31:32
Message-ID: CAFCRh--LGkYWR9ziyAiC_ESZ1NZupDSJZm9ALDmdjezT7r26+Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 3:29 PM Vydehi Ganti <rayudugs(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Can i know if there is any scenario or ref document for the design you suggested above?

Some docs:
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/ddl-rowsecurity.html
https://satoricyber.com/postgres-security/postgres-row-level-security/

Your Oracle function converted to PostgreSQL, FWIW. Use at your own risk.
https://chatgpt.com/share/680b8e36-b4ac-800e-9e0e-2601aecd2aee

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc Millas 2025-04-25 13:42:59 shared buffers
Previous Message Vydehi Ganti 2025-04-25 13:28:52 Re: Clarification on RLS policy