shared buffers

From: Marc Millas <marc(dot)millas(at)mokadb(dot)com>
To: "pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: shared buffers
Date: 2025-04-25 13:42:59
Message-ID: CADX_1abjKJhk10vWz6S=cwgXsppGXw2VjNnLVByE3EMJzLzD4w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

hello,

got something strange to me:
Same db ie. same data, around 1.2TB,one on pg13, one on pg16
same 16 GB of shared_buffers,
I am the single user.
both have track_io_timing on

on pg13, if I run a big request with explain (analyze,buffers),
I see around 6 GB read
if I do rerun the very same request, no more read(s), all data in the
shared buffers cache. fine
If I check with pg_buffercache what's in it, I see the biggest tables of my
request within the biggest users (in number of blocks used). All this is
fine.

next, if I do the very same on the pg16 machine, whatever the number of
times I rerun the explain (analyze, buffers) of the same request, each
time, the explain shows the same volume of reads. again and again.
If I check with pg_buffercache, the set of objects stay the same, WITHOUT
the objects of my request, just like if those objects where sticky.

any idea ?

thanks

Marc MILLAS
Senior Architect
+33607850334
www.mokadb.com

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc Millas 2025-04-25 13:50:53 replication
Previous Message Dominique Devienne 2025-04-25 13:31:32 Re: Clarification on RLS policy