Re: cutting down the TODO list thread

From: John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Oleksandr Shulgin <oleksandr(dot)shulgin(at)zalando(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: cutting down the TODO list thread
Date: 2020-11-11 13:29:00
Message-ID: CAFBsxsGP+qiLnC2KkOEW2URvvwC0zeYjYcEBsbZoBkiL5JSCKg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 7:08 PM Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 02:06:13PM -0400, John Naylor wrote:
> > I was thinking of not having the next updates during commitfest, but it
> could
> > also be argued this is a type of review, and the things here will be
> returned
> > with feedback or rejected, in a way. Ultimately, it comes down to "when
> time
> > permits".
>
> I don't understand what this is referring to. Thanks for the rest of
> the work.
>

This was awkwardly phrased, but I was concerned future proposals for
removal would be easy to miss during commitfest. At this point, I'm
thinking it isn't an issue.

--
John Naylor
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2020-11-11 13:30:44 Re: logical streaming of xacts via test_decoding is broken
Previous Message John Naylor 2020-11-11 13:26:39 Re: Clean up optional rules in grammar