Re: cutting down the TODO list thread

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Oleksandr Shulgin <oleksandr(dot)shulgin(at)zalando(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: cutting down the TODO list thread
Date: 2020-11-10 23:08:48
Message-ID: 20201110230848.GB12947@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 02:06:13PM -0400, John Naylor wrote:
> I was thinking of not having the next updates during commitfest, but it could
> also be argued this is a type of review, and the things here will be returned
> with feedback or rejected, in a way. Ultimately, it comes down to "when time
> permits".

I don't understand what this is referring to. Thanks for the rest of
the work.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com

The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2020-11-11 00:06:59 Re: Prefer TG_TABLE_NAME over TG_RELNAME in tests
Previous Message Daniel Gustafsson 2020-11-10 22:28:14 Re: Support for NSS as a libpq TLS backend