| From: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Declarative partitioning - another take |
| Date: | 2017-05-10 03:54:37 |
| Message-ID: | CAEepm=3vV1YKxDfLMqq-nYM2fN+STMYLwPKFCoah4M0gxqqNNg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 3:51 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Sun, May 7, 2017 at 9:44 PM, Amit Langote
> <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>> I think that makes sense. Modified it to read: "A statement that targets
>> a parent table in a inheritance or partitioning hierarchy..." in the
>> attached updated patch.
>
> LGTM. Committed.
+ A statement that targets a parent table in a inheritance or partitioning
A tiny typo: s/a inheritance/an inheritance/
--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2017-05-10 03:55:59 | Re: transition table behavior with inheritance appears broken (was: Declarative partitioning - another take) |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2017-05-10 03:51:02 | Re: Declarative partitioning - another take |