Re: Declarative partitioning - another take

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Declarative partitioning - another take
Date: 2017-05-10 03:59:34
Message-ID: CA+Tgmobbj0EKrde2-r5fMf9ai_b6bBX3Et8f9TrLT3hrV+M2RQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 11:54 PM, Thomas Munro
<thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> + A statement that targets a parent table in a inheritance or partitioning
>
> A tiny typo: s/a inheritance/an inheritance/

Now he tells me.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro HORIGUCHI 2017-05-10 04:54:58 Re: .pgpass's behavior has changed
Previous Message Robert Haas 2017-05-10 03:56:07 Re: May cause infinite loop when initializing rel-cache contains partitioned table