| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Declarative partitioning - another take |
| Date: | 2017-05-10 03:51:02 |
| Message-ID: | CA+Tgmoa9oby5jfcVhZHxGvv6DJFt-xTBkBC-RApEg2i74+uftw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, May 7, 2017 at 9:44 PM, Amit Langote
<Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> I think that makes sense. Modified it to read: "A statement that targets
> a parent table in a inheritance or partitioning hierarchy..." in the
> attached updated patch.
LGTM. Committed.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Munro | 2017-05-10 03:54:37 | Re: Declarative partitioning - another take |
| Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2017-05-10 03:48:03 | Re: transition table behavior with inheritance appears broken (was: Declarative partitioning - another take) |