Re: WIP: [[Parallel] Shared] Hash

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
Cc: Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WIP: [[Parallel] Shared] Hash
Date: 2017-01-09 22:09:15
Message-ID: CAEepm=1SdZn3Q+qAfgQfHy_9Xacu_aP1VJ4vGV583Y33+aAsRQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Jan 7, 2017 at 9:01 AM, Thomas Munro
<thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 10:53 PM, Thomas Munro
> <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>> I will post a new rebased version soon with that and
>> some other nearby problems fixed.
>
> Here is a new WIP patch.

To make this easier to understand and harmonise the logic used in a
few places, I'm now planning to chop it up into a patch series,
probably something like this:

1. Change existing hash join code to use chunk-based accounting
2. Change existing hash join code to use a new interface for dealing
with batches
3. Add shared hash join support, single batch only
4. Add components for doing shared batch reading (unused)
5. Add multi-batch shared hash join support

--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2017-01-09 22:23:06 Re: Increase pltcl test coverage
Previous Message Jim Nasby 2017-01-09 21:45:57 Re: Increase pltcl test coverage