| From: | Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Yugo NAGATA <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Numeric x^y for negative x |
| Date: | 2021-08-06 20:27:03 |
| Message-ID: | CAEZATCVC19V6cSmYBQ-VGxa6JHedWWrUZpdA+DURCzhoHceM7g@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 6 Aug 2021 at 21:26, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > On Fri, 6 Aug 2021 at 17:15, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> >> Looks plausible by eyeball (I've not tested).
>
> > So, I have back-branch patches for this ready to go. The question is,
> > is it better to push now, or wait until after next week's releases?
>
> I'd push now, given we have a failing buildfarm member.
>
> Admittedly, there may be nobody else using that compiler out in
> the real world, but we don't know that.
>
OK. Will do.
Regards,
Dean
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Zhang | 2021-08-06 22:18:43 | Re: [bug] Logical Decoding of relation rewrite with toast does not reset toast_hash |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2021-08-06 20:26:06 | Re: Numeric x^y for negative x |