Re: Numeric x^y for negative x

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Yugo NAGATA <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Numeric x^y for negative x
Date: 2021-08-06 20:26:06
Message-ID: 2557151.1628281566@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Fri, 6 Aug 2021 at 17:15, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Looks plausible by eyeball (I've not tested).

> So, I have back-branch patches for this ready to go. The question is,
> is it better to push now, or wait until after next week's releases?

I'd push now, given we have a failing buildfarm member.

Admittedly, there may be nobody else using that compiler out in
the real world, but we don't know that.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dean Rasheed 2021-08-06 20:27:03 Re: Numeric x^y for negative x
Previous Message Bossart, Nathan 2021-08-06 20:25:26 Re: Pre-allocating WAL files