Re: Numeric x^y for negative x

On Fri, Aug 06, 2021 at 09:27:03PM +0100, Dean Rasheed wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Aug 2021 at 21:26, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> >
> > Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > > On Fri, 6 Aug 2021 at 17:15, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > >> Looks plausible by eyeball (I've not tested).
> >
> > > So, I have back-branch patches for this ready to go. The question is,
> > > is it better to push now, or wait until after next week's releases?
> >
> > I'd push now, given we have a failing buildfarm member.
> >
> > Admittedly, there may be nobody else using that compiler out in
> > the real world, but we don't know that.
> >
>
> OK. Will do.
>

Hi Dean,

It seems you already committed this. But it's still as "Ready for
committer" in the commitfest app.

Are we waiting for something else or we can mark it as committed?

--
Jaime Casanova
Director de Servicios Profesionales
SystemGuards - Consultores de PostgreSQL