From: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Subject: | Re: Missing import in 035_standby_logical_decoding.pl |
Date: | 2025-08-01 22:19:47 |
Message-ID: | CAD21AoAX=cn=rua91bV+V6BOwXdGPZSyQ-0W9UPJBfsq1uZHBQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Aug 1, 2025 at 12:04 PM Melanie Plageman
<melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> 035_standby_logical_decoding.pl has this code
>
> # wait for postgres to terminate
> foreach my $i (0 .. 10 * $PostgreSQL::Test::Utils::timeout_default)
> {
> last if !-f $node_standby->data_dir . '/postmaster.pid';
> usleep(100_000);
> }
>
> but it does not import usleep as other tests do (like this)
> use Time::HiRes qw(usleep);
>
> I think it simply hasn't been called because postgres exits and
> terminates the loop before it has had a chance to be called. If you
> reorder the sleep and the loop termination condition, it fails
> immediately because it can't find usleep.
Agreed, usleep should be imported.
>
> On an unrelated note, I also noticed that hot_standby_feedback is not
> turned on during the test until we are explicitly checking for
> recovery conflicts. When it is enabled, the comment says "Turn
> hot_standby_feedback back on" -- but it was never on to begin with. I
> suspect this doesn't produce test instability because autovacuum is
> turned off for the whole test. But, I was wondering if the test
> authors meant for hot_standby_feedback to be enabled during the
> initial phases of the test (until it is explicitly disabled for
> testing purposes).
While I agree that the first "Turn hot_standby_feedback back on"
message is confusing for the reason you argued, I have no idea whether
we should enable hot_standby_feedback also during the initial phases
of the test. It could be a typo? I'll wait for comments from the
authors.
Regards,
--
Masahiko Sawada
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2025-08-01 22:22:06 | Re: Missing import in 035_standby_logical_decoding.pl |
Previous Message | Jelte Fennema-Nio | 2025-08-01 22:15:32 | Re: BackendKeyData is mandatory? |