Re: BackendKeyData is mandatory?

From: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
Cc: Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: BackendKeyData is mandatory?
Date: 2025-08-01 22:15:32
Message-ID: CAGECzQR=UxkhcjjeE04CdOovhnUWo6+Eivh6xYzKqkAjxedNwQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 1 Aug 2025 at 18:12, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> wrote:
> That's pretty low level. And there's no newline

Maybe we should change the message to something like:

"server does not support cancelling queries"

Then at least it's a bit clearer to users what's going on. The newline
issue seems like more work to fix.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Masahiko Sawada 2025-08-01 22:19:47 Re: Missing import in 035_standby_logical_decoding.pl
Previous Message Melanie Plageman 2025-08-01 21:36:19 Re: eliminate xl_heap_visible to reduce WAL (and eventually set VM on-access)