| From: | jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: typedef struct WindowClause misleading comments |
| Date: | 2026-06-09 06:11:57 |
| Message-ID: | CACJufxHD2rrEgdp-6oMsJeR0TqRWLb_oV3uUWscmsz1fHrqS_w@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jun 9, 2026 at 10:15 AM David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 9 Jun 2026 at 13:56, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > Query jumbling considers the ORDER BY clause; therefore, the comment
> > below is inaccurate.
> >
> > /
> > * The information relevant for the query jumbling is the partition clause
> > * type and its bounds.
> > */
>
> I think the comment should be deleted. It's pretty obvious which
> fields are used by looking at the pg_node_attr(query_jumble_ignore)
> attributes.
>
I agree.
Let's delete it.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Xuneng Zhou | 2026-06-09 06:13:54 | Re: t/035_standby_logical_decoding.pl might fail on attempt to read wrong timeline |
| Previous Message | Bertrand Drouvot | 2026-06-09 06:03:28 | Re: t/035_standby_logical_decoding.pl might fail on attempt to read wrong timeline |